1. In the first picture the Prada outfit doesn’t seem to be working for Jessica Stam. It doesn’t look like it fits or sits well. And her pose is kinda forced. In the third their faces look awful. It’s like an uncomfortable smile. Don’t like this editorial one bit and it’s sad because both women tend to have strong features. This is not Peter Lindbergh at his best. Not even close.

  2. stam is perfect 4 the editorial… very high fashion facial features. and the eyes, lets not even start with her eyes again.

    p.s. the Prada crystal-embelished items are all over… their just everywhere.

  3. I can’t stop looking at Stam’s right hand in the second photo. It looks like a shrivelled-up claw. The saving grace of this editorial is the final image, which is quite lovely. I have to agree with Oshcar, not Lindbergh’s best.

  4. Very unflattering, Stam looks pregnant in the second shot, and there’s something ‘off’ with the third shot. Not at all like Lindbergs’s usual impeccable work. As for Heidi, well she’s just bland, as per usual.

  5. the potential for this to be a great editorial was all there but somehow it looks messy. I agree with Mike about Stam’s shriveled hand, I also agree with trev-o about them looking like they have no clue what’s going on. it’s like they had all the right elements such as casting, photographer, styling etc. but somehow just couldn’t put it all together. Seems like the worst images of the batch ended up in the editorial and they cut all the good ones… if there were any.. looks like they did this entire shoot in a half an hour. too bad, i love those girls.

  6. I Love Stam With ll My Heart But This Ed Isn’t Working @ All

    The Make-up is wrong, the hair is all over the place. It saddens me because i actually like the idea and this could have been a great Ed

  7. The first picture is quite awkward. The second picture is horrible – her face looks perfect but the hands! It looks soooo awkward! You can’t even tell what the bag looks like! The way she’s holding the bag up against the wall looks really bad. The third would probably be good if they weren’t looking at the camera. The fourth would be good if she weren’t holding a mug… it makes the shot look sooooo posed!
    Of course, Stam looks beautiful as always.

  8. True, it could have been alot stronger given the looks and talent at hand.
    I find the connection between the perceived essence of daily activity meets demi-couture appeal a tad uninspired 🙁

    Anywho… hand over that Prada top.. stat!
    I’ve been dreaming it even.

  9. Not to be misinterpreted.. I am all for looking fashionably bonkers like Daphne while brown-bagging it..
    I meant that the photos didn’t do the notion justice..*If* that was indeed the intended effect. If not then scratch my thoughts.

  10. Jessica Stam very nice, very pretty. She is Canadian, gotta love the Canadian models. WOOTWOOT!!

  11. The photos look like washed-out amateur shots, but I’m sure that’s the intention otherwise it wouldn’t have made it to this point.
    Not a fan of the b&w shot, I don’t think it quite meets its intention of recreating 60s chic.
    Obviously great models, but I’ll bet they leave this shoot out of their portfolios.

  12. its art stop paying attention to details or models its the moment action both models eyes are working the face of heidi giving even more than suppose stam even though i loved stam i think she is just bohemian mess in paradise right now and its soooooooo pure cuz its real but girl wake up and show sth more they pay yu !!!!!!!!!!!

  13. They have more better photo in this story and I guess MDC picked the not-so-good one here.
    They actually look better on the prints.

Related Posts: