email newsletter
facebook
twitter
weibo
vimeo
youtube
Blonde On Blonde
March 31st, 2010 Janelle comments (42)Jessica Stam and Heidi Mount join forces for Harper’s Bazaar with a luxe editorial by Peter Lindbergh. The blonde beauties star as ladies who lunch, as Brana Wolf styles them in the season’s chicest all white ensembles: we are loving Stam in that crystal Prada number!
Heidi & Stam by Lindbergh | Image Credit – GivenchyHomme @ tFS
Related posts:
42 Comments
Post a Comment:
follow @models on twitter
models.com rss feed
models.com on youtube
models.com on tumblr
models.com on vimeo
Surreal Chic
New Star
The Master
First Look: TUSH
Second Cummings
Starshift 
Legend
Star Powered 
Young Love 
America's Bombshell
Come Undone
Versus' New Era
The Now Generation 
Modern Vintage
First Look: USED
Blonde Ambition
032c + Karlie
Pump Up the Volume
March 31st, 2010
at 12:14 pm
what s supposed this to be? the 15min of amateur fashion photography?
March 31st, 2010
at 12:39 pm
In the first picture the Prada outfit doesn’t seem to be working for Jessica Stam. It doesn’t look like it fits or sits well. And her pose is kinda forced. In the third their faces look awful. It’s like an uncomfortable smile. Don’t like this editorial one bit and it’s sad because both women tend to have strong features. This is not Peter Lindbergh at his best. Not even close.
March 31st, 2010
at 12:54 pm
I knew I’d see you in this post Truman!
March 31st, 2010
at 1:05 pm
stam is perfect 4 the editorial… very high fashion facial features. and the eyes, lets not even start with her eyes again.
p.s. the Prada crystal-embelished items are all over… their just everywhere.
March 31st, 2010
at 1:06 pm
not feeling it at all…
and what happened to Jessica Stam’s hand in 2nd photo, it looks like its being twisted by someone…
The only thing that I like is Stam’s eyes, gosh they are just so breath taking, gorgeous eyes.
http://williscrazy.blogspot.com
March 31st, 2010
at 1:14 pm
this is just one hot mess
March 31st, 2010
at 1:19 pm
Jessica fits even better, than expected for this editorial. It’s beautiful
http://allaboutmodels.blogspot.com/
March 31st, 2010
at 1:33 pm
I can’t stop looking at Stam’s right hand in the second photo. It looks like a shrivelled-up claw. The saving grace of this editorial is the final image, which is quite lovely. I have to agree with Oshcar, not Lindbergh’s best.
March 31st, 2010
at 1:35 pm
Very unflattering, Stam looks pregnant in the second shot, and there’s something ‘off’ with the third shot. Not at all like Lindbergs’s usual impeccable work. As for Heidi, well she’s just bland, as per usual.
March 31st, 2010
at 1:36 pm
the only thing that I like in the editorial is Jessica Stam’s eyes…
Nothing else..
http://williscrazy.blogspot.com
March 31st, 2010
at 1:43 pm
this is just so amature looking
I dont even know where to begin on how much I dislike this editorial. They both look alike and they both look like they have no clue what they are doing..they actually look very sick and I dont mean thin sick I mean cold sick http://trevofashionisto.blogspot.com
March 31st, 2010
at 1:58 pm
I love those girls.
March 31st, 2010
at 2:18 pm
I love it. http://allaboutnewfaces.blogspot.com/
March 31st, 2010
at 2:19 pm
Very exclusive.
http://allaboutnewfaces.blogspot.com/
March 31st, 2010
at 2:23 pm
I’m with AJP on this one.
March 31st, 2010
at 2:25 pm
i like the casting
March 31st, 2010
at 2:48 pm
the potential for this to be a great editorial was all there but somehow it looks messy. I agree with Mike about Stam’s shriveled hand, I also agree with trev-o about them looking like they have no clue what’s going on. it’s like they had all the right elements such as casting, photographer, styling etc. but somehow just couldn’t put it all together. Seems like the worst images of the batch ended up in the editorial and they cut all the good ones… if there were any.. looks like they did this entire shoot in a half an hour. too bad, i love those girls.
March 31st, 2010
at 3:05 pm
I Love Stam With ll My Heart But This Ed Isn’t Working @ All
The Make-up is wrong, the hair is all over the place. It saddens me because i actually like the idea and this could have been a great Ed
March 31st, 2010
at 3:32 pm
I love this, very simple yet chic!
March 31st, 2010
at 4:42 pm
The first picture is quite awkward. The second picture is horrible – her face looks perfect but the hands! It looks soooo awkward! You can’t even tell what the bag looks like! The way she’s holding the bag up against the wall looks really bad. The third would probably be good if they weren’t looking at the camera. The fourth would be good if she weren’t holding a mug… it makes the shot look sooooo posed!
Of course, Stam looks beautiful as always.
March 31st, 2010
at 6:38 pm
True, it could have been alot stronger given the looks and talent at hand.
I find the connection between the perceived essence of daily activity meets demi-couture appeal a tad uninspired
Anywho… hand over that Prada top.. stat!
I’ve been dreaming it even.
March 31st, 2010
at 6:46 pm
Not to be misinterpreted.. I am all for looking fashionably bonkers like Daphne while brown-bagging it..
I meant that the photos didn’t do the notion justice..*If* that was indeed the intended effect. If not then scratch my thoughts.
March 31st, 2010
at 8:09 pm
The 3rd pic is giving me a Portia DeRossi and Ellen DeGeneres vibe. Nice.
March 31st, 2010
at 9:22 pm
I think this editorial was meant to be ‘imperfect’
March 31st, 2010
at 10:20 pm
Jessica Stam very nice, very pretty. She is Canadian, gotta love the Canadian models. WOOTWOOT!!
March 31st, 2010
at 11:40 pm
i love heidi’s looks, so beautiful. not such a fan of stam.
April 1st, 2010
at 1:33 am
blah…what is this? a fashion editorial?
April 1st, 2010
at 3:53 am
Stam looks lovely!
http://thesingular.blogspot.com
http://ftourist.blogspot.com
April 1st, 2010
at 4:00 am
i love the dalmatians!
April 1st, 2010
at 5:26 am
OMG lovely. Heidi <3
April 1st, 2010
at 5:30 am
Sure don’t look porfessional, but why is everybody talking abt stam? HEIDI ROCKS!
April 1st, 2010
at 10:02 am
Oh, Hi Stam. Where have you been?
April 1st, 2010
at 10:10 am
Seemingly very natural almost playful
April 1st, 2010
at 5:00 pm
The photos look like washed-out amateur shots, but I’m sure that’s the intention otherwise it wouldn’t have made it to this point.
Not a fan of the b&w shot, I don’t think it quite meets its intention of recreating 60s chic.
Obviously great models, but I’ll bet they leave this shoot out of their portfolios.
April 2nd, 2010
at 3:17 pm
Looks pretty good.
April 3rd, 2010
at 9:40 am
wow! whats wrong with legend PETER LINDBERGH. this is terrible…
April 3rd, 2010
at 8:04 pm
Im continually drawn to Stams face, which is just so beautiful.
April 4th, 2010
at 11:04 am
stam is so pretty it sickens me
April 4th, 2010
at 2:42 pm
I like the Stam´s eyes, however the intention was suggest that they are lesbian?
April 9th, 2010
at 9:40 pm
its art stop paying attention to details or models its the moment action both models eyes are working the face of heidi giving even more than suppose stam even though i loved stam i think she is just bohemian mess in paradise right now and its soooooooo pure cuz its real but girl wake up and show sth more they pay yu !!!!!!!!!!!
April 10th, 2010
at 11:42 am
They have more better photo in this story and I guess MDC picked the not-so-good one here.
They actually look better on the prints.
June 15th, 2011
at 12:17 pm
♥