Vogue vs. Vogue

July 6th, 2009 Posted by Janelle comments (37)

Every edition of Vogue brings its own special brand of chic to the table but who is grabbing your attention for August? First up, Edita Vilkeviciute‘s classic beauty stands out on the cover of Vogue Germany – but can anything overshadow the kitschy polka-dot text?

Sasha Pivovarova looks ladylike on the cover of British Vogue with her power Balenciaga and petal pink pout. The Patrick Demarchelier shot is very pretty but where is the wild and untamed Sasha we’ve come to know and love?

Who did it better this month – Edita on German Vogue or Sasha on Brit?

Image Credits |

chanelnumber5 & nijuyanah at tFS

Related posts:


  1. glue says:

    Neither really outshines the other. They are both nice albeit a tad boring.

  2. the girl says:

    Well Edita can do no wrong and Sasha is just sublime. I call it an even draw. They both look beautiful!

  3. Prominent Scatologist says:

    Yawm! Next.

  4. Idan says:

    agree with glue. 🙂

  5. AX80 says:

    Well, I see them as two very different kind of models. Edita is a bit more of a classic beauty while Sasha is a bit more unique. I think both covers have their own unusual appeal even if Sasha’s is resting a bit more on the safe side. Then again, it’s British Vogue so it’s fine to be chic and simple.

  6. Pamela says:


  7. Cora says:

    German Vogue: Same problem as ever – matching the colors of the dress with the title and the result is boring.
    British: Sasha looks really great but in combination with all the pink text it looks more like an In-Touch-Cover to me…

  8. Ryo says:

    For overall design and layout. I’d give it to the German edition. The Brit version imo looks very dates…like early 80’s Cosmo. |x

  9. Ryo says:


  10. raie says:

    i gotta say US vogue and italia vogue stand out most to me the text the color even the sign of the word vogue sells

    edita has that classic beauty as everyone said
    sasha has a more other worldly beauty and edge

    honestly they both don’t really stand out to me but i love both girls 🙂

  11. AJP says:


  12. md says:


  13. Ivonna says:

    Sasha is striking a supermodel pose…and Edita, in this shot, is boring–although the layout colors are beautiful. anyhow, I think Vogue Britain takes it!

  14. yumpopink says:

    that shirt edita’s wearing was on gwen stefani in the recent elle cover…who’s the designer?

  15. GP says:

    Sasha has reached another beauty level on this cover, stunning yet simple!!! British Vogue always look safe and commercial.

  16. ania says:

    sasha!!! without comparison!!

  17. ania says:

    sasha without comparison!!!!!!

  18. ryan says:

    Gosh im so sick of sasha

  19. k says:

    Edita’s cover is so-so…Sasha’s is just plain BORING…

  20. jay14 says:

    sasha stands out. that face is amazing. nobody compares to sasha right now.

  21. irin says:


  22. Edita says:

    Edita is more beautiful for sure!

  23. Derek says:

    Hands down Sasha has the better cover. Her cover not only has hotter fashion and better coloring, but proves Sahsa can mix it up from her usual ‘wild and untamed’ self. In my opinion it’s like relating “Vouge” to “Teen Vogue”. Bravo, Mr. Demarchelier.

  24. Bertrand says:

    yeah, both covers look boring and nothing pops

  25. Luke says:

    yumpopink, Edita’s wearing fall Louis Vuitton on the cover, I think. The necklace as well.
    Sasha’s cover is beautiful, but the text situation at British Vogue is getting ridiculous. They’re a step away from covering their models’ faces with a big G, a la Japanese Vogue.

  26. me says:

    Sasha reminds me of Estella Warren on this cover !

  27. JT says:

    Neither cover are amazing. They look like high school Senior pictures.

  28. Michael says:

    I think both are beautiful but I have to side with the Sasha Cover..Something more enticing about the poise and windblow

  29. Sofia says:

    edita!!sasha is boring. edita has beutiful face

  30. Nadia says:

    edita of course!!!!!!

  31. kels says:

    i personally prefer the german cover! but you can tell that the only thing both of them had to do was just stand there and look pretty.

  32. sam says:

    edita rules here. but so does sashas!! idk???? im suprise sasha pulled this, she looks cute, natural, and pink. BUt edita looks very gorgeous and calm, the styling is good, i really dont know

  33. Nigel S. says:

    Sasha hands down….Is it even a question! Edita is just standing there. Just because she’s more beautiful as some might say, doesn’t make her the better of the two. Look at Sasha, that girl is werkin!!!! And she always does to the max. It’s the lighting and the components of the cover that make Edita’s shine brighter. Sorry Edita fans. Sasha owns it!

  34. Devon says:

    I always prefer Sasha, she is fantastic. But I think Edita is amazing in the shot…she looks so much better

  35. MOss77 says:

    Sasha… HELLO people… Why is this even up for discusiion.. there is no comparison!!

  36. Lena says:

    Sasha! I like the British vogue cover better because Sasha look’s so peachy, so fresh.

  37. Kyzvalov says:

    I am laughing at these comments.. Edita Vilkeviciute, for sure. Her beauty simply stand out from those two BORING covers. She is delicate, with nice classic features, whilst Pivovarova can’t get rid of her agressive, always boring face.

Post a Comment:

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)


follow @models on twitter