email newsletter
facebook
twitter
weibo
vimeo
youtube
A Tale of Two Terrys
May 20th, 2010 Janelle comments (45)Terry Richardson takes Doutzen Kroes in two very different directions with their recent collaborations. For Vogue Russia’s cover, Terry shows Doutzen dirtied up and looking dangerous as part of his sex portfolio, but tones it down for Vogue US with a sweet beach story. Which look do you prefer – sexy or sweet?
Terry and Doutzen for Vogue Russia | Scan by Never Drink Again @ tFS
Terry & Doutzen for Vogue US
Related posts:
45 Comments
Post a Comment:
follow @models on twitter
models.com rss feed
models.com on youtube
models.com on tumblr
models.com on vimeo
Resort Getaway
Anja Update 
Surreal Chic
New Star
The Master
First Look: TUSH
Second Cummings
Starshift 
Legend
Star Powered 
Young Love 
America's Bombshell
Come Undone
Versus' New Era
The Now Generation 
Modern Vintage
First Look: USED
Blonde Ambition
May 20th, 2010
at 12:30 pm
dont think im an american conservative liking only the “cute and holy” stuff or something!
im european and i must say that i really like the vogue us photos much more. in the sex editorial and on the cover doutzen just looks cheap and the photos are so boring!
at least thats what i think of those photos posted…
May 20th, 2010
at 12:35 pm
nice…i like Doutzen Kroes.
May 20th, 2010
at 12:38 pm
People need to stop hiring Terry Richardson .Period
May 20th, 2010
at 12:48 pm
i like the pics.. i think they’re super cute and sultry
May 20th, 2010
at 12:53 pm
The American version looks much more respectable.
May 20th, 2010
at 12:57 pm
@ Joe
You said “People need to stop hiring Terry Richardson .Period”
But when we follow the link to your site, the first image we see was shot by Terry Richardson. Yeah… umm…. we know you didn’t hire him for your amazing blog but if you’re going to hate on the guy, you should probably at least consider the idea of NOT using his work on your blog.
May 20th, 2010
at 12:59 pm
I can hardly recognize her on the vogue russia cover.
However, I like the Vogue US editorial
it’s so bubbly
http://williscrazy.blogspot.com
May 20th, 2010
at 1:16 pm
Oh, lovely Doutzen is soo versatile.
May 20th, 2010
at 1:32 pm
Doutzen is just so incredibly pretty. She looks good in everything! http://www.chungkitblog.wordpress.com
May 20th, 2010
at 1:37 pm
I think th quality of the cover isn’t best compared to Vogue Italy or Nippon. Well, Doutzen looks nice in the editorial, no doubt.
http://allaboutmodels.blogspot.com/
May 20th, 2010
at 1:57 pm
Both, HORRIBLE.
May 20th, 2010
at 3:22 pm
Like the Vogue US editorial more, it’s more innocent and still sexy!
http://myfashioninsider.blogspot.com/
May 20th, 2010
at 3:27 pm
Ugh how can someone so out of this world pretty look like this.T. Richardson is ridiculously overrated. Wake up minions! Move on.
May 20th, 2010
at 3:54 pm
i love her!!!
May 20th, 2010
at 3:58 pm
Agreeed. All of terry richardsons photo’s are trashy theres nothing compelling about his photos or even talent. i thought i was the only one who thought he was overrated!
May 20th, 2010
at 4:22 pm
Terry consistently takes very raw and natural images filled with personality. One of my favorite photographers.
I don’t like the cover but I love the pics where Doutzen is smiling.
May 20th, 2010
at 4:27 pm
dont like either. mostly because of terry, and i feel as if doutzen has lost her full model potential (at least i havent seen it in years!) sad with such a beautiful girl. commercial is definitely her route these days and I can see why. its like her face roundness is overtaking her pretty little delicate features. do not like. that doesnt photograph well imo. where is the bone structure???!!
May 20th, 2010
at 4:40 pm
Very cute pics!!
May 20th, 2010
at 5:18 pm
Doutzen look like a pretty regular girl who wears a lot of make up. She looks healthy too. Yeah.
In Vogue Russia, they slapped her with a lot of eye make up to achieve the “sexy” look. But who wears those eye make up at the beach? Maybe the Russians?
US Vogue tried to cover up her Body…..why bother, is Natasha Poly not available?
May 20th, 2010
at 5:23 pm
these are both so so boring, i used to think terry did terry well, now other people take terry pictures better than terry!! this looks cheap and has no imagination, doutzen is so much more beautiful than how she has been “captured” here
May 20th, 2010
at 5:59 pm
Only like the Vogue US ed. shades would have made it even better. VR no. not the best look. Terry should be kept to publications such as blender and maxim.
May 20th, 2010
at 6:38 pm
Both are great but give me a dirty, dangerous girl any day!
PS: LOVE that they used a David Sedaris book as a prop. Everyone should read him if they haven’t already.
http://calvinshow.blogspot.com
May 20th, 2010
at 7:41 pm
terry has a great knack for getting his subjects to look playful and comfortable – like he’s shooting friends he’s known for years. i think both eds are great and doutzen looks awesome!
May 20th, 2010
at 11:30 pm
She is beautiful but doesn’t look like a model anymore.
Terry’s work is good and bad sometime, depends on the clients.
May 21st, 2010
at 2:50 am
Doutzen is amazing and I like Terry’s simplistic look. Most people couldn’t do half as good.
May 21st, 2010
at 3:40 am
looking..so..so…so…so..so..so..gorgeous..
May 21st, 2010
at 5:20 am
Doutzen looks gorgoues in both. Between the two editorials I prefer the US vogue.
May 21st, 2010
at 6:00 am
Like Doutzen but not Terry’s photography bc it doesn’t seem to progress, its always the same old same old and I don’t think that has to do with it being his ‘signature’ bc others like Miesel, Sorrenti, etc. have progress throw times and still maintained their signature style without every picture looking the same
May 21st, 2010
at 8:13 am
i can hardly recognize doutzen in the Vogue cover
i don’t know..but the expressions and the poses don’t work for me.
May 21st, 2010
at 9:06 am
Terry Richardson does always the same. NOT A FAN.
May 21st, 2010
at 10:12 am
@GP
You’re right. Her beauty is way too healthy to belong to a model. She just looks like a flat-out gorgeous girl.
May 21st, 2010
at 1:14 pm
like ki ara vandzrev doutzen kroze,auuh ra shevundzrevdiiii iiif…
May 21st, 2010
at 3:50 pm
Her work with Steven Meisel was the best.
May 21st, 2010
at 6:29 pm
Jouw me de mem van Doutzen mar
May 21st, 2010
at 6:34 pm
Her and Hillary Rhoda grew up to be gorgeous regular commercial girls, which ain’t bad since they Bank on that!
May 22nd, 2010
at 3:50 am
Woooow! Hot!
http://thesingular.blogspot.com
http://ftourist.blogspot.com
May 22nd, 2010
at 6:33 am
its a bit flat if you ask me
May 22nd, 2010
at 5:13 pm
Anyone notice how Doutzen and Alessandra have the SAME exact pose for their latest international Vogue covers? How creative, LOL.
May 23rd, 2010
at 1:12 pm
very eauty
http://supercharmingbeautymodel.blogspot.com/
May 23rd, 2010
at 4:58 pm
LOVE DOUTZEN…. hate terry
I would love to see her being the HF model she was, I mean, I still love her but she just was the queen of the catwalks
May 23rd, 2010
at 8:10 pm
the US looks better in my opinion.. the russian cover looks a bit hideous.. yeah bad terry.. he is really great most of the time though
May 26th, 2010
at 3:10 am
Well anyone who actually likes Scarry Richardson’s photos had better by two copies because Vogue has finally gotten some balls and dropped that loser.
May 28th, 2010
at 8:19 am
I read Tavi’s post & the one Tavi’s recommended here
They hit the nail HARD ON THE HEAD
*FASHION MAGAZINES* need to stop peddling his porn & it’s sad that so few people are talking …. it’s like we should wear our “touched by terry” tshirts and shut the f*ck up
June 3rd, 2010
at 4:50 pm
Doutzen is gorgeous.. the more I read about Terry the more I hate him.
July 18th, 2010
at 11:04 pm
thats really sad that some 14 yr old is blogging about a sexual predator/photographer on the internet.
Terry is about T&A. He is delusional and thinks he is pushing boundaries when he is really acting out his own predatory desires. The photos are about a desperate photographer trying to achieve status thru exploitation.